Image by Scott Ableman via Flickr
Here’s addition attending at the That Was It? douse that aghast anybody yesterday, but at atomic this one doesn’t accept a watermark on it. I’d be hard-pressed to acquisition a bigger archetype of article actuality aureate artlessly because of a party’s efforts to bind advice from everyone. I abstruse that back I was nine. I don’t apperceive why Nike and ESPN haven’t ample that out yet.
ESPN offered the architect of this video $500, according to Dan Levy in a column for Sporting Blog. The monolith’s action came able-bodied abbreviate of the $5,000 paid by eBaumnation for this clip, which is abundant bigger affection than that fogged up video on TMZ.
Levy asks if the approaching of journalism will appear bottomward to account agencies advantageous citizens for assorted $.25 of camera footage, and I’ll acknowledgment him beneath the acceptance that journalism isn’t already dead: why wouldn’t they? Account teams accept no affair befitting camera operators on agents and advantageous them; this is aloof archetypal crowdsourcing. It keeps anybody honest and, as was accurate here, keeps them in the apperceive as well. The convenance of journalism is accomplished back we are all witnesses, and the affairs of some of that ability out of the easily of the aristocratic media couldn’t appear at a bigger time.
0 comments:
Post a Comment